Files
2026-09-04 14:58:42 +08:00

3.3 KiBLFS
Raw Permalink Blame History

name, description
name description
transaction-trace-analysis Teaches evidence-based analysis of transaction logs and traces. Use when reconstructing transaction behavior from tables, TSV/CSV files, timestamps, counters, object histories, validation records, abort records, retries, partial logs, or when producing classified transaction outputs from trace evidence.

Transaction Trace Analysis

Use this skill when the task provides concrete logs, tables, counters, timestamps, or partial records and asks you to infer transaction behavior.

This skill is about reconstruction under partial evidence:

  • normalize columns into a stable event vocabulary
  • reconstruct per-transaction intent and per-object version timelines
  • join them through explicit fields (not through row order guesses)
  • produce a minimal, auditable classification for the required output

Quick Reference (pick the next file to read)

If you need… Read
Mapping weird columns into tx/key/op/timestamp/counter/status/reason trace-schema-normalization.md
Grouping events per transaction and avoiding “attempt vs request” mixups transaction-history-reconstruction.md
Reconstructing a per-key version timeline from writes/validation object-version-history.md
Interpreting timestamp/counter semantics and scope correctly timestamp-and-ordering-fields.md
Understanding validation failures, abort reasons, and conservative checks validation-and-abort-records.md
Avoiding overclaims when the trace is incomplete evidence-quality-and-uncertainty.md
Emitting deduped/sorted ids and minimal justifications output-classification-patterns.md

Trace Ledger (what you build first)

Build two tiny ledgers before doing any deep inference:

Transaction ledger

txn_id -> {
  seen_keys: [...],
  read-evidence: (key, observed_version_fields...),
  write-evidence: (key, installed_version_fields...),
  validation/abort-evidence: [...],
  candidate_commit_fields: ...,
}

Object ledger

key -> timeline [
  { event: write/abort/validate, txn_id, version_fields, counter_fields },
  ...
]

Only after both exist should you attempt joins like “did T’s read become stale?” or “could an aborted T have committed?”

Workflow (operational)

  1. Schema normalization: name every column; identify scope for each counter/timestamp.
  2. Per-txn reconstruction: summarize each txn’s evidence and candidate serialization point fields.
  3. Per-key reconstruction: build a timeline per key; validate what orders it (wts? counter?).
  4. Decision modeling: re-express the protocol’s decision rule in terms of trace fields.
  5. Classification: prove “must abort” vs “could commit” vs “unknown from evidence.”
  6. Output: dedupe ids, sort if required, write exact format.

Common Pitfalls

  • Treating per-key counters as global order.
  • Using file row order as time order without justification.
  • Calling something ‘unnecessary’ without exhibiting a safe order consistent with evidence.